Skip to main content

Comments

Submitted by MIsterShortcut (not verified) on 06 Jan 2020 - 00:15 Permalink

Where we CAN all agree is that Patrick Flanagan appears to've scammed many people. Far worse, perhaps, his half-plagiarized, half-irrational and unfounded claims tend to injure credibility of more than just "some branch of knowledge." Vastuu Shastra is the oldest formal science developed by humans. Knowing how to do the one-second energy test allows you to test food, drink, clothes, cars, etc. (www.QRA.me, bidigitals.com, bidgitally.com, & others for quick one-minute lessons)
"Proof supersedes belief or opinion!"

Not one human in a billion can continue holding their thumb & finger tightly when you hold a cellphone to their body. Same when you pinch a power cord, or touch index fingertip to fuse box, fridge, TV, computer, etc: Other hand loses ability to keep thumb & finger tightly together. No need to believe it. STFU and do the one-second test w/ friend or family member.

More ASTONISHING to every one of thousands of patients we've taught this to, EXPOSE THE EMF-PRODUCING DEVICE TO THE TOP OF PAGE AT Megaphotons.com or d144.com or J233.com for a second or two, then test again.

ONLY AFTER you test and prove something does your "opinion" have any value to the rest of us. No one's immune from this master secret of the universe. (Hmph: NO FOOD, tapped 10 or 12x on table, can be held in two pinched fingers with other hand still holding tight: EVERY food we test is weak. Expose it to free Megaphotons images and see what stored frequencies can do when in a medium that broadcasts. (Photos, videos, sounds, magnetite minerals, shungite, and a few others).

Less talking, more testing, yes?

Primary point Alfred makes about Flanagan is spot on, actually. We own devices produced by Flanagan. We've never discerned the tiniest benefit, including the expensive brain devices (two generations of them). So, yes, Flanagan is a scammer, Doesn't mean Alfred should throw the baby out with the bathwater, as wiser minds used to remind us. Proof supersedes belief or opniion, right? Cheers, and good energy.

Submitted by Alfred Armstrong on 18 Dec 2018 - 17:28 Permalink

Betsy, thanks so much for your patronising and rude comment. Ii is nice to be noticed.

I am not suppressing anything, any more than you are suppressing my views by offering yours. I haven't stopped this book from being published, or burned all the extant copies in a big bonfire: I have simply offered my opinion, which may be wrong.

Flanagan blatantly lied and plagiarised in his book so forgive me if I am disinclined to take what he says at face value.

I agree however that I do not know everything about the universe.

Cheers, Alfred

Submitted by Betsy (not verified) on 18 Dec 2018 - 17:03 Permalink

This is what we call suppression of information. By purposefully ridiculing scientific findings with no scientific proof of your own you are effectively participating in the suppression of humans waking to who and what we really are. There are so many things in this Universe you do not understand. For example the pyramid is not meant to SHARPEN a razor blade but instead allow the molecules to rearrange themselves in such a way to repair the damage done through use. THEN you resharpen. I get it if you are not ready to accept things you do not understand but blouting off about it after concluding you do not understand it simply ignorant.

Submitted by MisterShortcut (not verified) on 31 Jul 2018 - 15:21 Permalink

Shame on Alfred, not a very bright fellow. The fault you point out is the one you engage the most in, LOLOL: Seeking to refute with no experimentation. Bob Marshall (of PRL and QRA fame) spent years and large sums having "perfect" pyramids engineered, precisely 54 degrees.

After years of using it, I routinely recite thousands of digits of Pi -- including the ability to interrupt myself, speak on another subject, then pick up where I left off. Regarding "e" and Fibonacci computing, no human has ever come close.

As usual, you've already formed at least two, perhaps three or four opinions on the preceding paragraphs... despite your not having a moment of consideration or experimentation.

What makes these memory and computational feats so surprising is that, prior to making use of the pyramid... and the nine inventions I've created as a result... is that I've inhaled weed AT LEAST a quarter of a million times in 45 years, which means my memory should be fairly well shot through and through. True enough?

Yet, I created all 2,389 Masters and Millionaires websites (Psychology of Shortcuts, Psychology of Longevity, et alia), with approx 14.4 million pages.... all after the age of 43. No, there's no solicitations for selling, harvesting emails; in fact, there's no signup required on these 2,389 MisterShortcut websites.

You can't say I'm doing it for glory, as my birth name has no place in all this: "MisterShortcut" is simply a surrogate, a unifying personality gathering the wisdom of masters and millionaires, champions and billionaires. That's because the only person who should EVER be speaking in a room filled with humans.... is the person who does it best. Everyone else is full of blatherskite. "Who SHOWS it best proves to KNOW it best."

Yes, the project has cost far beyond a million dollars. As for the supercharging devices created as a result of pyramid knowledge, ie: Foodboosters, Supercharged Lasers, high-speed healing lasers, QVials, Brainlifters, Torroids, and more:

a) Every one of these devices requires no belief: Only two people doing a one-second QRA test, based on the MEDICALLY-PATENT BDORT. That one-second test is the reason I believe Alfred is a decidedly unhappy, and financially unsuccessful person. Don't merely think it: Be confident of it. You see, winners don't tear down the work of people who take action, only losers do that, as misery loves company.

b) These devices have sold, thousands to many thousands each ... and never has a dime of profit gone into the hands or accounts of MisterShortcut or his founding partner, the BRILLIANT and generous Dr. David Cohen, ND, PhD, MH, CNC, sitll listed on google as the "greatest doctor on earth" .... even years after Dr. Cohen was brutally killed, perhaps for his many secrets and successess.

c) Lest you even momentarily think the foregoing is exaggerative or inaccurate, consider this: No company or individual in the history of the human race has ever received feedback such as you'll find at HappyBuyers.info or HappiestCustomers.com.

Soon, I shall shuffle off this mortal coil. It's mostly been a wonderful life. How gratifying to look in the mirror and see a face in its seventh decade that belies the years and challenges, as a smile underlies and reinforces most every important effort.

So, as stated, feeling bad for Alfred. Where other people, even here in this 'Skeptics' Corner,' open their minds to think and consider, Alfred seems to think he knows better than people whose intellect render Alfred as the unhappy kid he must still be.

Lighten up, Alfred: ALWAYS EXPERIMENT BEFORE OPENING THE MOUTH... because, as we claim in the motto of all 3 of my organizations, including the cornerstone efforts to continue raising over a million cups of food for starving people each week... ... ... "Proof is better than belief."

... Best wishes and best energy to all who help the helpless ... and strive to fulfill the definition of success (inaccurately) credited to Ralph.Waldo Emerson. Suggest you consider looking it up ("To laugh often and much")

Submitted by turtlechipmonk (not verified) on 08 Jan 2013 - 23:10 Permalink

OMG you bunch of cretinous monkies! I just wanted to come on here and rattle your monkey cages! Eat peanuts you book burners! Soon the pyramid technology will break through even into your dull consciousness,.. well maybe not, but for the rest of us, rainbow cosmic orgasms ahoy!!

Submitted by Alfred Armstrong on 11 Jul 2012 - 12:47 Permalink

Tom, did you also test with other covers? For example a box-shaped one, a pyramid of different proportions, ones made of different materials translucent or opaque? If not, your experiment doesn't demonstrate anything very much. Something changed in the environment and the ants responded. It might simply have been your shadow as you placed the pyramid over them, for instance.

Flanagan, as a pretentious plagiarist who doesn't have the words critical thinking in his vocabulary, doesn't deserve anything more than mockery.

Submitted by tom edwards (not verified) on 11 Jul 2012 - 10:51 Permalink

I bought that book apparently just after it came out, 3 years after graduating from Berkeley. Looked around my place now. Couldn't find it.
Instead of insulting someone, like is so common today, I made a simple
test. I constructed a pyramid to exact Cheops proportion, about a foot
square, and put some sugar cubes in an ant-infested area. They climbed'
all over them. Then I put my translucent pyramid over it and they immediately became very agitated and left the cubes, looking for the
exits, so to speak.

Submitted by Alfred Armstrong on 11 Jul 2012 - 12:47 Permalink

Tom, did you also test with other covers? For example a box-shaped one, a pyramid of different proportions, ones made of different materials translucent or opaque? If not, your experiment doesn't demonstrate anything very much. Something changed in the environment and the ants responded. It might simply have been your shadow as you placed the pyramid over them, for instance.

Flanagan, as a pretentious plagiarist who doesn't have the words critical thinking in his vocabulary, doesn't deserve anything more than mockery.

Submitted by Yega (not verified) on 06 Apr 2012 - 05:17 Permalink

Dis boi pat flannolette is very good writa. He relly relly make a big sense to me cause i am what dey call yungsta j from the bellergo. Hehe i love patty flan flan he da man man and I can tell you that de pyramid of giza dus magic things i was there when eye was yung and probs bout 8 years old and i got taken by enormous things into what they called a void from da mind. I Have seen many things which a word cant describe its like no other sense it is what my daddy showed me in the pyramid and i hav never been tha same since den. My Daddy had to cut himself for de things which wanted mummy to be naked and they make me Lick the trickling blood from my mums bum and wow it was such a funny moment but the things did not like or enjoy that i could be laughing. my dad was only a little mean to me at once stage he had to put something inside my tuut tuut but my mum hugged me and it was okay and felt relly good after that. I cant remember what happened next its not a memory it was an experience but not something i can saY but yeah pyramid is the only thing i am now i can say with a confident approach that every anomoly is visible with tender care and rarity.. Quite odd really. Peace
Submitted by Alfred Armstrong on 22 Nov 2011 - 20:10 Permalink

I don't hate authors Anadon, I just try to see if what they write makes sense or not. In this particular case, would you defend the author's plagiarism that I pointed out?

It surely does no anyone any favours to suggest that keeping an open mind means not being critical of what someone writes if it happens to align with one's prejudices. That is the opposite of thinking for oneself: it's lazy and it encourages fraud and quackery.

Don't say shut up when you don't like what you hear, find a proper argument against the criticism. In this case, some actual evidence of the author's claims would be more convincing than yet another moan against sceptics like myself. I used to believe this sort of guff myself, many years ago, but reading widely has convinced me otherwise.

Submitted by AnadonShaizar (not verified) on 22 Nov 2011 - 19:45 Permalink

PS. Lisa I hope you don't throw the book away, at least donate it to a Goodwill or something, maybe somebody else might like to read it. I am a book lover and my library does contain this book.
Submitted by AnadonShaizar (not verified) on 22 Nov 2011 - 19:39 Permalink

Wow!! A site to hate authors, I guess haters have to have a place to hate; but this site also promots authors who hate on others for their beliefs and perspective on information that they have researched in the time when the books were written. All because they are different. These types of writings should be read with an open mind so as to see how the writings speak to your mind and if you find you don't like them that is fine. There is no need to bash somebody or to make fun at their appearance, or is that what we have all come to. If so we should all be careful because NONE of us believe or feel exactly the same and we could be next to be bashed. I was also wondering has anybody tried to build any of the items from the electrical diagrams? I think you might be surprised if you did.
Submitted by Alfred Armstrong on 22 Nov 2011 - 20:10 Permalink

I don't hate authors Anadon, I just try to see if what they write makes sense or not. In this particular case, would you defend the author's plagiarism that I pointed out?

It surely does no anyone any favours to suggest that keeping an open mind means not being critical of what someone writes if it happens to align with one's prejudices. That is the opposite of thinking for oneself: it's lazy and it encourages fraud and quackery.

Don't say shut up when you don't like what you hear, find a proper argument against the criticism. In this case, some actual evidence of the author's claims would be more convincing than yet another moan against sceptics like myself. I used to believe this sort of guff myself, many years ago, but reading widely has convinced me otherwise.

Submitted by FrancoisTremblay (not verified) on 23 May 2011 - 13:50 Permalink

I've pointed out some instances in the past of books which they considered "weird" and how it was hypocrite of them to single out those topic and not other topics that people of the liberal persuasion believe in. It did not go over very well. Mainly it's just me being me. I complain about a lot of things.
Submitted by Alfred Armstrong on 23 May 2011 - 13:22 Permalink

Not sure what you mean by hypocrisy, Francois. Care to elucidate?

Submitted by FrancoisTremblay (not verified) on 23 May 2011 - 13:50 Permalink

I've pointed out some instances in the past of books which they considered "weird" and how it was hypocrite of them to single out those topic and not other topics that people of the liberal persuasion believe in. It did not go over very well. Mainly it's just me being me. I complain about a lot of things.
Submitted by FrancoisTremblay (not verified) on 23 May 2011 - 13:15 Permalink

I don't like that site, there's too much hypocrisy. But to each his own.
Submitted by Alfred Armstrong on 23 May 2011 - 13:22 Permalink

Not sure what you mean by hypocrisy, Francois. Care to elucidate?

Submitted by FrancoisTremblay (not verified) on 23 May 2011 - 13:50 Permalink

I've pointed out some instances in the past of books which they considered "weird" and how it was hypocrite of them to single out those topic and not other topics that people of the liberal persuasion believe in. It did not go over very well. Mainly it's just me being me. I complain about a lot of things.
Submitted by Alfred Armstrong on 06 May 2011 - 13:27 Permalink

Hi Lisa. Here's another site you might like if you don't know it already: http://awfullibrarybooks.net/

Submitted by FrancoisTremblay (not verified) on 23 May 2011 - 13:15 Permalink

I don't like that site, there's too much hypocrisy. But to each his own.
Submitted by Alfred Armstrong on 23 May 2011 - 13:22 Permalink

Not sure what you mean by hypocrisy, Francois. Care to elucidate?

Submitted by FrancoisTremblay (not verified) on 23 May 2011 - 13:50 Permalink

I've pointed out some instances in the past of books which they considered "weird" and how it was hypocrite of them to single out those topic and not other topics that people of the liberal persuasion believe in. It did not go over very well. Mainly it's just me being me. I complain about a lot of things.
Submitted by Lisa (not verified) on 06 May 2011 - 03:51 Permalink

I am discarding this book from the library where I work this very moment. I came across this page while searching for "ventilated prose" because I wondered just what the heck he meant by this (and as mentioned on another website, I find the broken-up paragraphs rather hard to read visually, although I gather it's intended to improve comprehension in reading aloud). I was very amused to see that you had the exact same thought as I did about the picture on the back. Before reading this page, I swear, my exact thought was "author with his pyramid tent and his pyramid *pants*, yikes!"
Submitted by Alfred Armstrong on 06 May 2011 - 13:27 Permalink

Hi Lisa. Here's another site you might like if you don't know it already: http://awfullibrarybooks.net/

Submitted by FrancoisTremblay (not verified) on 23 May 2011 - 13:15 Permalink

I don't like that site, there's too much hypocrisy. But to each his own.
Submitted by Alfred Armstrong on 23 May 2011 - 13:22 Permalink

Not sure what you mean by hypocrisy, Francois. Care to elucidate?

Submitted by FrancoisTremblay (not verified) on 23 May 2011 - 13:50 Permalink

I've pointed out some instances in the past of books which they considered "weird" and how it was hypocrite of them to single out those topic and not other topics that people of the liberal persuasion believe in. It did not go over very well. Mainly it's just me being me. I complain about a lot of things.